Opinion

Blog: Rogue landlord database

David Smith
Written by David Smith

The Government published a consultation around reform of the the rogue landlord database at the weekend.

In this blog first published on Anthony Gold, our policy director David Smith writes about this consultation.


This last weekend did not only see the publication of the section 21 consultation, but the Government also published a consultation around reform of the the rogue landlord database.

There is clearly an element here of getting things done before the inevitable government changeover caused by the change in prime minister and the summer recess.

The rogue landlord database allows for local authorities to list people who have had a conviction from a specified list or who have had two or more fixed penalties issued to them in the last 12 months. It also lists landlords who have been banned. It has been somewhat controversial as there have been no entries made in the few months since it came into operation. In addition, there is no power for the public to access the database, it is only for use by local authorities.

The consultation proposes allowing access to the database for tenants and potential tenants and looks at the different groups who might potentially require access, why they might want it, and how this might be facilitated with reasonable controls to prevent other persons simply pulling all the data for their own purposes. There is also a consideration as to whether or not landlords and agents should have to tell tenants that they are listed on the database. However, it is hard to see how this requirement would be enforced.

The consultation also asks whether the list of reasons to be placed on the database should be changed. Currently there are a range of offences which someone who has been convicted before a court can be added for. As mentioned above if two or more civil penalties have been issued within 12 months for an offence then this also allows a listing. The consultation asks if people should be listed for a single civil penalty should be included. There is also discussion about listing persons who have not committed any offence. This includes landlords who have been served with an improvement notice as well as landlords who have been ruled not to be fit and proper on a licence application, who have had their licence revoked, or been made subject to a management order for their properties. There are also proposals to list agents who have been removed from redress schemes.

Some of these entry options are ones that are found on the Mayor of London’s rogue database. While widening the scope of the entries is inevitable given the scope of the Mayor’s database this change sets up an unhelpful element of competition between the two systems. London local authorities are actively using the Mayoral database while there are appear to be no entries on the official database. Having these two competing systems is hardly useful and effectively creates a “London privilege” in relation to enforcement activity.

*Disclaimer: The information on the Anthony Gold website is for general information only and reflects the position at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. It is provided without any representations or warranties, express or implied.*

About the author

David Smith

David Smith

David Smith is the Policy Director for the RLA and a Partner at Anthony Gold Solicitors. David obtained his degree and doctorate from the University of Wales, Aberystwyth in International relations before re-qualifying as a lawyer. He is known for his expertise in residential landlord and tenant law and has advised the Welsh Assembly, local government, and numerous landlords and tenants of all sizes.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.