London

City Council clamp down on HMOs is ‘draconian’ says critic

A city council has started licensing every House in Multiple Occupation – with the decision proving highly divisive.

One agent called the selective licensing scheme ‘draconian’, while the local press has reported claims that landlords would evict ‘hundreds’ of tenants who share properties.

Oxford Council now requires every landlord in the city who owns a property where there are three or more unrelated tenants to get an HMO licence.

Failure to do so could result in prosecution and a £20,000 fine. A licence for a typical three-bedroom shared house will cost £362.

The council, the first local authority in the country to introduce a HMO scheme beyond the mandatory one covering the whole of its area, says the new policy will involve licensing approximately 5,000 properties in total.

The council wants to restrict HMOs to one in five properties on any 100-metre stretch of road, which critics say will badly hit the supply of student properties and also groups of other sharers such as nurses.

They claim that landlords will not want to go to the expense and trouble of obtaining a licence, and they will simply choose tenants who form single households.

But Joe McManners, member for housing at Oxford Council, said: “HMOs have long been recognised as being a particular problem in the city, with many examples of poor-quality homes and in some cases being poorly managed. These damage the reputation of good landlords and we are determined to put this right, and stop those doing the right thing being undercut by cowboys.

“The private rented sector is hugely important to the residents of Oxford, not just in terms of providing much-needed accommodation, but also with the impact that it can have on local communities, and licensing every HMO will help drive up standards for everyone.”

Frank Webster, director of Oxford agents Finders Keepers, said the selective licensing scheme was totally unnecessary. He said: “We believe the council already has sufficient powers to tackle any isolated problems caused by the very small minority of irresponsible landlords or mismanaged properties.

“We don’t see the need for a whole lot of extra draconian licensing. Will it affect those landlords who are already dodging the system? No it won’t. And it will lead to more shortage in affordable housing for professionals.”

Oxford city council is also due to implement Article 4 Directions this month, requiring landlords with properties currently let to a single household to seek planning permission for change of use if they plan to let the property out to a small group of sharers in future.

A number of other authorities are lined up to introduce similarly large selective licensing schemes. The most ambitious of all is Newham in London, which wants to license every single private landlord and their properties in the borough – not just HMOs.

About the author

RLA

RLA

The Residential Landlords Association (RLA) represents the interests of landlords in the private rented sector (PRS) across England and Wales. With over 23,000 subscribing members, and an additional 16,000 registered guests who engage regularly with the association, we are the leading voice of private landlords. Combined, they manage almost half a million properties.

1 Comment

  • Ensuring all HMO landlords are licensed and held accountable for the well being of their tenants IS essential. Clamping down on rogue HMO landlords who rent unsafe, unsanitary and overcrowded HMO rooms is how it should be. NOT clamping down on it is ‘draconian’. Dear God, do you not realise until ALL landlords are held accountable, until ALL landlords are required to be licensed that we will never get away from Draconian living standards.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.