Letter to minister calls for clarity on immigration plans

Sally Walmsley
Written by Sally Walmsley

Last week it was reported that the government is planning ‘further sanctions’ for landlords who knowingly let to tenants without permission to live and work in the UK – with the new plans to be revealed in a White Paper this summer.

Landlords already face up to five years in prison and unlimited fines for breaching right to rent rules. The scheme requires landlords check prospective tenants’ immigration status and ensure they have the right to rent in the UK.

The statement in the Times was attributed to an unnamed minister, who was quoted as saying: “We will be making landlords and employers do a lot of the heavy lifting on the enforcement. That’s the direction of travel.”

RLA Chairman Alan Ward has now written to Immigration Minister Robert Goodwill MP asking for clarification on the issue and a meeting to discuss any plans that may impact on landlords.

Copies of the letter have also been send to Minister of State for Housing and Planning, Gavin Barwell MP, Chair of the Homes Affairs Select Committee, Rt Hon Yvette Cooper MP and Clive Betts MP – Chair of the CLG Select Committee

The letter reads:

Dear Minister,

I write with reference to an article in the Times on 22nd March 2017 entitled “Employers could face jail for ignoring immigration rules.”

The article states that “under the new plans, landlords found guilty of knowingly letting to illegal immigrants could also face a maximum sentence of five years.”

I should be grateful if you could confirm that far from being a “new plan”, since 1st December 2016 a maximum sentence of five years has already been introduced for landlords found guilty of this offence.

The article quotes an unnamed “senior minister” as saying of plans for an immigration system post-Brexit that the Government “will be making landlords and employers do a lot of the heavy lifting on enforcement.”

Such language is clearly alarming for landlords who are already, faced with the threat of prosecution, becoming reluctant to rent property to those who cannot easily prove their identity, even where they have a right to rent. In its recent research the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants found that:

  • 51% of landlords surveyed said that the right to rent scheme would make them less likely to consider letting to foreign nationals.
  • 42% of landlords stated that they were less likely to rent to someone without a British passport as a result of the scheme. This rose to 48% when explicitly asked to consider the impact of the criminal sanction.
  • An enquiry from a British Black Minority Ethnic (BME) tenant without a passport was ignored or turned down by 58% of landlords, in a mystery shopping exercise.

We are concerned that further measures to make landlords do the “heavy lifting of enforcement” will make landlords more reluctant to rent to those who cannot easily prove their nationality. This would be a particular concern for the 17% of the UK born population without a passport.

Our own research with our members found that 43% were less likely to rent to those who do not have a British passport because of the fear of criminal sanctions for getting it wrong.

Nearly two-thirds said that they were less likely to rent to those who only have permission to stay in the UK for a limited period of time and 56% are less likely to rent to people coming from outside the EU or EEA.  

The survey found also that 63% of landlords are worried that they will make a mistake or be caught out by forged documents and be unfairly fined. Just 13% reported having found the Home Office’s Advice Line helpful to them.

Given the importance of a balanced relationship between a tenant and landlord based on trust, we are concerned that, as seems to be suggested in the quote provided by the unnamed Minister, landlords are being expected increasingly to fulfil a role that should be undertaken by border agencies, which will cause tensions between landlords and those tenants who cannot easily prove their right to rent without a passport.

In light of this, we would welcome an early opportunity to meet with you and/or officials to discuss our concerns in further detail ahead of the Government publishing its plans for an immigration system post Brexit.

Such a meeting would provide an opportunity to consider:

  • What more the Government and Crown Prosecution Services could do to produce clear and publicly available guidance to reassure landlords that those caught out by, for example, forged documents, will not face prosecution.
  • What work the Home Office has been doing with other departments to understand the cumulative impact of this measure, together with all other regulations and legislation being introduced into the sector over the next few years, on the supply of homes to rent and rent levels. Changes include:
  • Phased changes to Mortgage Interest Relief starting from April this year:
  • New energy efficiency regulations coming into force in April 2018;
  • Landlords continuing to need to adjust to the roll out of Universal Credit;
  • Plans to reform the system of HMO Licensing and room sizes in rental accommodation which DCLG has recently consulted on; and
  • The continued implementation of the Housing and Planning Act 2016.

In light of the considerable interest in this matter among RLA members and the public more widely, I am publishing this letter on our website and copying also the Housing Minister, and the Chairs of the Home Affairs and CLG Select Committees.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours sincerely,

Alan Ward


About the author

Sally Walmsley

Sally Walmsley

Sally Walmsley is the Magazine and Digital Editor for the NRLA. With 20 years’ experience writing for regional and national newspapers and magazines she is responsible for editing our members' magazine 'Property', producing our articles for our news site, the weekly and monthly bulletins and editorial content for our media partners.

1 Comment

  • Pushing the role of Immigration Control onto ordinary members of the public (which is what landlords and employers are). Having read this atricle and allowed myself to think more widely about the whole thing, I am shocked at the implications. As far as I can see, there are a number of implications:

    1/ The government will no doubt be saving money and probably be more effective at controlling immigration, which is increasingly on the agenda whether we like it or not. More people who are not following official channels will be caught and ‘processed’. And more people will be prey to unscrupulous individuals who will offer accommodation and employment beyond the scrutiny of government.

    2/ Landlords and Employers will naturally gravitate towards British nationals as tenants and employees just because it makes life easier and there is less worry due to the chance of error resulting in fines/prison. Even when individuals aren’t discriminatory, the system will be inherently discriminatory by design which is worse. Much worse in my view and could it be that it is illegal on that basis. And I’m sure that there a number who read this who will applaud that effect.

    3/ As there are so many people who are landlords or employers, I believe that the thinking that these systems foster will be detrimental to the cohesiveness of our society. It effects will be subtle but potentially pervasive.

    I’m the mixed-race son of an immigrant and impacted by the growing discrimination in our society. And yet I surprised myself by noticing my impulse to discriminate when answering some of the RLA questionnaire questions on Right to Rent.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.