Campaigns Regulation and Enforcement Wales

Mandatory 12-month contracts plan for rented homes in Wales

Sally Walmsley
Written by Sally Walmsley

New plans to extend the notice period for so-called ‘no fault’ evictions in Wales would give tenants 12-month contracts by default.

The Residential Landlords Association (RLA) says it is scandalous the government is planning such changes without first reforming possession routes for the vast majority of landlords who have legitimate reasons to repossess their property.

Under Section 173 of the Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016, the Welsh equivalent of Section 21, private landlords cannot repossess properties in the first six months of the tenancy. 

Now Welsh housing minister Julie James AM has announced plans to extend the subsequent notice period from two to six months, meaning it will be a year in total before a landlord is able to repossess.

RLA Vice Chair and director for Wales, Douglas Haig, said: “This is scandalous move that is essentially introducing 12-month contracts by default. 

“Creating a situation where a property cannot be repossessed within the first six months and then introducing a further six-month notice period could cause huge problems for landlords.

“They will be left powerless when it comes to problem tenants, who will be legally allowed to stay in the property for a year. If tenants are not paying rent, huge arrears could build up in this time.

“We will be warning government that this move could cause serious damage to landlord confidence and the availability of homes to rent in Wales, at a time when demand continues to increase.

“The government needs to ensure that landlords with a genuine need to regain possession of their properties are able to do so.”

The Welsh government will now consult on whether to increase the minimum notice period of Section 173 from two months to six months, and on plans to restrict issuing of a Section 173 for six months after the start of the contract.

About the author

Sally Walmsley

Sally Walmsley

Sally Walmsley is the Magazine and Digital Editor for the NRLA. With 20 years’ experience writing for regional and national newspapers and magazines she is responsible for editing our members' magazine 'Property', producing our articles for our news site, the weekly and monthly bulletins and editorial content for our media partners.

1 Comment

  • Everyone is talking about the proposed removal of Section 21 (in England) as being the boogey man that will all but the destroy the private rental sector, BUT if, and only IF, this is done properly, THE REMOVAL OF SECTION 21 WOULD BE VASTLY PREFERABLE TO WHAT JULIE JAMES IS PROPOSING. All section 21 possessions are carried out for a reason.

    By “done properly” what I mean is many more grounds to cater for niche markets (such as quickly removing bad tenants from HMOs where they’re causing disruption to the lives of other tenants), PROPER reform to the housing courts so cases are heard within a reasonable timescale and possessions granted swiftly where the landlord’s case is proven.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.