Campaigns Local Government Region Yorkshire & the Humber

Proposed Leeds selective licensing scheme an ‘unnecessary financial burden’ for landlords

Victoria Barker
Written by Victoria Barker

The RLA has responded to a consultation that is being run by Leeds City Council on proposals to introduce selective licensing in the areas of Beeston and Harehills.

Under proposals currently under consultation, if selective licensing comes into force in these areas, it means that landlords will be required to pay for a licence, costing £825,  to rent out their property lawfully.

The RLA has raised a number of concerns about this selective licensing scheme in its formal response to the consultation, which you can read here.

What is Selective Licensing?

If a property is in a designated selective licensing area, this means that landlords are required to  apply for a licence in order to rent it out lawfully. For a local authority to declare a selective licensing area, the area must be:

  • An area of low housing demand and/or
  • An area affected by anti-social behaviour where the private landlords have failed to take steps to control anti-social behaviour by their tenants.
The RLA’s response to introducing selective licensing in Beeston and Harehills

You can read some of our main concerns with the proposed selective licensing scheme below.

‘Discounts are not big enough’

One of the main concerns that the RLA has with the selective licensing proposals is that it believes the cost of a licence is too excessive, even when taking discounts into consideration.

While the RLA recognize Leeds Council’s Ingrowth Inclusive Strategy 2018-2023 wants to improve the quality of private sector housing, we believe that expecting lawful landlords to pay for expensive licences will ‘alienate lawful landlords’ because it burdens them with additional costs.

Good landlords will apply for licences and, likely, pass the cost on to tenants in the form of increased rents, doing nothing to address affordability, while the worst landlords – the criminal operators will continue to operate without a licence, below the radar.

Failure to justify why scheme is necessary

In the response, we highlight why the council has failed in its documents to prove sufficiently that private rented sector houses are the main perpetrators of anti-social behaviour and crime. The council has very similar issues in predominantly council/social housing estates with their highly regulated housing management and property standards and this is clearly not solely a landlord issue.

What does the RLA suggest as an alternative to introducing selective licensing in these areas of Leeds?

Leeds City Council has access to the Controlling Migration Fund, which allows local authorities to tackle local service pressures associated with any recently increased migration, which includes tackling rogue landlords and driving up standards.

We believe that Leeds City Council, and other councils who are consulting on introducing selective licensing, should fully use the enforcement powers already granted to them by the Housing and Planning Act 2016, ranging from civil penalties, rent repayment orders and banning orders, rather than rely on Licensing Schemes to regulate landlords in addition to these powers.

The response also discusses the option of the Council using ‘Tenure Intelligence (Ti) which combines artificial intelligence and housing data, instead of introducing selective licensing.

Engagement with landlords

Earlier this month, we attended a Leeds landlord Forum meeting where we discussed with landlords and a representative from the Council the proposed scheme in more detail.

There are other factors we have mentioned in our response in our response as to why we are opposed to the selective licensing proposals, including that the Council should consider the results of the Government’s Selective Licensing review (due to be published  in Spring) before going ahead with this.

Our response also mentions our concerns that this new scheme would put pressure on non-selective licensing areas and highlights the option of co-regulation should the scheme be approved.

Learn more about the scheme and have your say. 

The consultation closes on Wednesday 31st October. You can respond to the consultation on the Leeds City Council website here.

Next month, the Leeds Landlords Conference will take place in the City. Find out more here. 

About the author

Victoria Barker

Victoria Barker

Victoria is the Communications Officer for the RLA.

She is responsible for producing articles for our Campaigns and News Centre, the weekly E-News newsletter and media review, and creating social media content. She also contributes to our members magazine, Residential Property Investor.


  • They are attempting to control the tenant through the landlord by making the landlord responsable for anti social behaviour and crime using the pretext of driving up housing standards to do so, and getting us to pay for it via absolutely extortionate fees. Its absolutely in part income generating, they have seen an opportunity to raise a lot of money to offset cuts elsewhere. I see in Brighton, with southern high rents and property prices, the proposed fee is £400.
    The average value of a two bed back to back terrace in Beeston is £60k, and the rent £400. Yet LCC want £852 per let!
    The majority of ASB and crime in Beeston is drug, and drug dealing related. Its carved up into street by street dealing, 95% run by Asian groups, hardly any of whom live in the PRS, all in privately owned or social housing. There have been high profile cases in the Leeds press of prosecutions as a result of turf wars between rival groups.
    There were not any regular police foot patrols in the area for several years, its only in the last few months that the police have increased their presence.
    Some problem tenants, generally from low social/economic groups, are in the PRS in Beeston having previously been evicted from social housing elsewhere by the council. If the council wish eventually to “socially cleanse” the area of these, they are just going to end back at the council’s door to be housed.
    I’ve been a landlord in Beeston for 13years so I should know.

  • I refer to selective licensing as “mob money” – equivalent to the Mafia extracting money by coercion! They demand payment with penalties if not paid and give nothing for it!
    I told this to a member of Ashfield DC when they introduced SL bout 2 years ago

  • err..basic logic by-pass here..

    If there are, for example, 1000 landlords operating in Harehills & say 20 of them are `rogue` WHY would LCC charge 980 `good` landlords for the privilege of letting their property?

    980×825=£808,500.00 in fees from landlords who have done no wrong but are compelled to essentially buy a license from LCC.

    This is patently wrong & unfair. LCC is raising money from good landlords to pay LCC find `rogue` else can the method be justified?

  • Be fair Steve. They have 2 departments of people with nothing to do, after the Selective Licensing schemes in Holbeck and East End Park finished. They don’t sack staff, so they have to find something for them to do.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.